I have a question/suggestion, if you'd indulge a prospective buyer: Serious lurker here, thank you Amirm and all the members on this site, quite an amazing resource. The best surround music I have heard so far, with oh so cool schtick, is Pink Floyd & the Queen Greatest Hits DTS 96khz. Great sounding explosions & whispering wind if squash factor is not so bad.
Follow the instruments/vocals around the room. I purpose there is no "done right" to strive for in multi channel.
#Jayson tatum stats 2021 season movie#
I once heard a line in a movie after a guy was near an explosion: "Movies are irresponsible on how they make explosions sound." So as of now humanity is not even striving for realistic sound as far as I can tell. So I can hear why realistic sounding 5 microphones is not even a goal. Ironically, I, and I think most people, don't even like live. Anyway, I betchya even if classical does use 5 microphones mixes some schtick as well. Not opera? At least opera we could have known what the fat lady really sounds like. And only classical & jazz mixing engineers have the goal of sounding more realistic. So I guess you are saying "done right" is 5 microphones. Maybe it is whoever is charge of how one should create 5.1 tracks in the first place. I think even Blu ray these days are optimized for Netflix squash factor.Ĭlick to expand.I was blaming the mixing engineer, not the medium. Would be way better if we focused on not squashing all our movies vs more schtick channels. I did not feel: Wow Atmos is soooooo immersive vs 5.1. I am not convinced Atmos has so much better schtick that the difference is so big that it is worth dealing with ceiling speakers and all the other complexities like more amps, more Trinnov channels, & multi multi channel DAC's. Not something to make audio more realistic. Movies do far better job on the surround than music. They put what ever they want sometime good and sometimes just weird. They don't put 5 microphones in the field to make it sound that much more realistic. And deal with speakers on ceiling for that? And surround music wasn't what I thought. So I get discrete channels from speaker not in front of me so I can experience a space ship at a 20 degree angle instead of 90. I was thinking it would be great to have Atmos so I can remove 5.1 from the description.īut I am not feeling it yet. I have the worlds most advanced audio geek/audio science approved 5.1 system in the world.
#Jayson tatum stats 2021 season pro#
Are the dropouts continuous? After 10 minutes on the Pro version?Īlso, for the Atmos fans there is an alternative all digital product: Arvus Atmos-h2-4d. I take no responsibility and am not an electrical engineer. Not sure if leaving a electrical device unused for years is good? Does anyone have science on that? While my backup that was never hot & not used other than to test it. Also maybe it broke it? I connected the dac8 almost after 2 years of use and cooking. I'm not an electrical engineer, but I googled that the audio digital clocks have some heat related influence. Using Trinnov DAC no issues on all audiopriase products. So only would cut out like once or twice. Not long it was 5 minutes and every 2 minutes. So work around was to play music for 10 minutes before serious using, like watching a movie. At first never more than 10 minutes after playing and it dropouts for a second every minute or so. The 203 that has this super hot to touch Clones PSU had dropouts when I first installed the dac8. Besides user configurable AES/SPIDF that was also included in the second release. There are physical differences on the board with the capacitors. This dropouts are specific to the ES9038PRO dac chip.Īudiopraise made second release to address this. People complained about it in the audiopriase forum for the 203. Little history on the audiopraise dropouts:
0 kommentar(er)
